الثلاثاء، 11 مارس 2014

العنف التقليدي وغير التقليدي بين الشباب :فحص نظرية التوتر العامة-2





التوصيات :
     ويمكن الاستفادة من نتائج الدراسة الحالية وتقديم التوصيات لمن يتعامل مع المراهقين والشباب ، للوصول إلى الشباب قبل أن تؤثر فيهم ظروف التوتر وآثارها السلبية لسلوك طريق الانحراف ، لذا تقترح الدراسة على المدارس تقديم برامج التوعية الصحية ومهارات إدارة النفس للحد من إحتمالات الإصابة بآثار التوتر نتيجة الصراع والنزاع بين الأفراد بما في ذلك التسلط عبر الانترنت .
( De Wolfe & Saunders, 1995 )

     ومن خلال تدريس طلبة الفصول على حدة أو توعية الطلبة في الاجتماع العام بهم ، فعلى المربين إرشاد الطلبة لطرق سلامة النفس والشخصية ليتجنبوا الإجهاد والتوتر والسلوك العدواني . وأن يشعر الطلبة بالحرية في الحديث والمناقشة مع هيئة التعليم بمدارسهم  وذلك من خلال توفر البيئة الآمنة والتعاطف بين الجميع ، ويحتاج الطلبة إلى التنفيس للحصول على الدعم العاطفي والمواساة ومحاولة فهم كيف يصبحون عرضة لضحايا التسلط ، وهذه البيئة تعزز خط التواصل المفتوح بين الطلبة والعاملين بالمدرسة ، وهذا يقلل من حدوث النتائج السلبية والصراعات الشخصية بين الطلبة . 
( Anderson, 1998)

     وقد حددت الدراسات الأولية في هذا المجال العلاقة بين المناخ المدرسي الإيجابي والتسلط ، وبالتالي كلما ساد هذا المناخ كلما قل تعرض الطلبة إلى حوادث العنف والتسلط .
(Hinduja & Patchin, 2009)

     لذا إجراء مزيد من الدراسات ضروري لتحديد خصائص المناخ المدرسي وأثره على الحد من الصراعات الشخصية التي تؤثر على الفئة العمرية لأفراد عينة الدراسة .

     التوتر كما ذكر سابقاً يؤدي إلى الضغط على الفعل التصحيحي ويتطلب نوعا من التحرر ، وقد يكون هذا التحرر إيجابياً أو سلبياً ، حيث أشارت الدراسات أن المراهقين الذين تتراوح أعمارهم بين 11 إلى 15 سنة يتعرضون إلى التوتر إلى درجة  مزمنة مثل الاستسلام والانسحاب والعداء .
( Hampel & Petermann, 2005 (

     لذا على المربين فتح منافذ إيجابية بالمدرسة  وتوفير للطلبة طرقاً تقيهم من السقوط والانحراف مثل الأنشطة خارج المنهج الفكرية والبدنية لإشغال وقت فراغهم واكتشاف وتنمية الذات والميول الشخصية وتريحهم من الإجهاد والحياة المتوترة .

القيود :
     على الرغم من وجود مزايا لهذا العمل الحالي يجب الاعتراف بوجود بعض الصعوبات ، أولاً : لا يمكن تعميم نتائج الدراسة  لعينة الدراسة الحالية على مستوى كل المدارس بالولايات المتحدة ، كذلك  طول المدة الزمنية بين العنف التقليدي خلال (30) يوماً وبين التسلط عبر الانترنت خلال (6) شهور ونظرياً يحدث التوتر متزامناً مع المشاعر السلبية والمشاركة بالعنف .

     أن يسأل المراهقين عن سلوكيتهم يعد ذلك مشكلة ، فهؤلاء المتورطون بالعنف التقليدي والتسلط يقدمون إجابات تكون مقبولة اجتماعياً ، وبعض الباحثين يقولون أن البيانات ذات أثر رجعي لا يمكن الاعتماد عليها ، ويجب إعادة النظر في بنود أداة الدراسة ، إلا أن الدراسة الحالية حاولت تقديم منهجية سباقة في هذا المجال .

الخاتمة :
     كشفت الدراسة الحالية عن أي مدى كانت حجج نظرية التوتر (  GST  ) قادرة على شرح أشكال العنف التقليدي وغير التقليدي في أوساط  عينة الدراسة وهي طلبة المدارس المتوسطة في أكبر منطقة تعليمية بالولايات المتحدة ، والنتائج متسقة مع الدراسات السابقة بشان نظرية التوتر ودعم متواضع لتأثير مباشر للتوتر على الانحراف ولكن لا توجد أدلة لتأثير التدخل ، ونتائج هذه الدراسة إلى الحاجة لإجراء مزيد من الدراسات المتعلقة لأشكال العنف غير التقليدي والانحراف الذي يرتكبه المراهقون باستمرار .

     مشكلة الصراع الشخصي ما زالت قضية مهمة لنقل المراهقين عبر مراحل النمو في حياتهم ، وإذا كان التوتر والمشاعر السلبية بشكل مستقل تفاقم المشكلة بين أوساط أفراد العينة فأن النتائج تسلط الضوء على أثنين من المجالات التي تتطلب اهتماماً واستجابة مركزة من قبل الأفراد والمنظمات لتحديد العوامل المؤثرة ، ومن المؤمل أن الدراسة الحالية تساعد على رسم سياسة للمهتمين بشئون الشباب للحد من انتشار وشدة وتأثير العنف على حد السواء العنف التقليدي والعنف عبر الانترنت .





References
Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency.
Criminology, 30(1), 47-87.
Agnew, R. (2000). Strain theory and school crime. In S. Simpson (Ed.), Of Crime and
Criminality: The use of theory in everyday life (pp. 105-120). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Pine Forge Press.
Agnew, R. (2006a). General strain theory: Recent developments and directions for
further research. In F. T. Cullen, J. Wright, & M. Coleman (Eds.), Advances in
criminological theory, taking stock: The status of criminological theory (Vol. 15,
pp 101-123). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Agnew, R. (2006b). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Agnew, R., & White, H. R. (1992). An empirical test of general strain theory.
Criminology, 30, 475.
Anderson, D. C. (1998). Curriculum, culture and community: The challenge of school
violence. In M. Tonry & M. Moore (Eds.), Youth violence (pp. 317-363). Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Aseltine, R. H., Gore, S., & Gordon, J. (2000). Life stress, anger and anxiety, and
delinquency: An empirical test of general strain theory. Journal of Health and
Social Behavior, 41, 256-275.
Besag, V. E. (1989). Bullies and victims in schools. Milton Keynes, UK: Open
University Press.
Bjorkqvist, K., Ekman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. (1982). Bullies and victims: Their ego
picture, ideal ego picture, and normative ego picture. Scandinavian Journal of
Psychology, 23, 307-313.
746 Youth & Society 43(2)
Borg, M. G. (1998). The emotional reaction of school bullies and their victims. Educational
Psychology, 18, 433-444.
Boulton, M. J., & Underwood, K. (1992). Bully victim problems among middle school
children. British Journal of Educational Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 62,
73-87.
Bowers, L., Smith, P. K., & Binney, V. (1992). Cohesion and power in the families of
children involved in bully/victim problems at school. Journal of Family Therapy,
14, 371-387.
Brezina, T. (1996). Adapting to strain: An examination of delinquent coping responses.
Criminology, 34(1), 39-60.
Brezina, T., Piquero, A. R., & Mazerolle, P. (2001). Student anger and aggressive
behavior in school: An initial test of Agnew’s macro-level strain theory. Journal of
Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 362-386.
Broidy, L. M. (2001). A test of general strain theory. Criminology, 39(1), 9.
Brownfield, D., & Sorenson, A. (1993). Self-control and juvenile delinquency: Theoretical
issues and an empirical assessment of selected elements of a general theory
of crime. Deviant Behavior, 14, 243-264.
Compas, B. E., Orosan, P. G., & Grant, K. E. (1993). Adolescent stress and coping:
Implications for psychopathology during adolescence. Journal of Adolescence,
16, 331-349.
Crick, N. R., & Bigbee, M. A. (1998). Relational and overt forms of peer victimization:
A multi-informant approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,
66, 337-347.
de Anda, D., Baroni, S., Boskin, L., Buchwald, L., Morgan, J. N., Ow, J., et al. (2000).
Stress, stressors and coping among high school students. Children and Youth Services
Review, 22, 441-463.
De Wolfe, A. S., & Saunders, A. M. (1995). Stress reduction in sixth-grade students.
Journal of Experimental Education, 63, 315-329.
Dollard, J., Doob, L., Miller, N., Mowrer, O., & Sears, R. (1939). Frustration and
aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Endresen, I. M., & Olweus, D. (2001). Self-reported empathy in Norwegian adolescents:
Sex differences, age trends, and relationship to bullying. In A. C. Bohart,
C. Arthur, & D. J. Stipek (Eds.), Constructive and destructive behavior: Implications
for family, school, and society (pp. 147-165). Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association.
Ericson, N. (2001). Addressing the problem of juvenile bullying. Washington, DC:
U.S. Government Printing Office, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice
Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Esbensen, F., & Huizinga, D. (1991). Juvenile victimization and delinquency. Youth
& Society, 23, 202-228.
Patchin and Hinduja 747
Fagan, J., Piper, E. J., & Cheng, Y. (1987). Contributions of victimization to delinquency
in inner cities. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 31, 586-613.
Finkelhor, D., Turner, H. A., Ormrod, R. K., & Hamby, S. L. (2005). The victimization
of children & youth: A comprehensive, national survey. Child Maltreatment,
10(1), 5-25.
Frydenberg, E., & Lewis, R. (1993). Boys play sport and girls turn to others: Age,
gender and ethnicity as determinants of coping. Journal of Adolescence, 16,
253-266.
Hampel, P., Meier, M., & Kummel, U. (2008). School-based stress management training
for adolescents: Longitudinal results from an experimental study. Journal of
Youth and Adolescence, 37, 1009-1024.
Hampel, P., & Petermann, F. (2005). Age and gender effects on coping in children and
adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 73-83.
Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization
and psychological maladjustment: A meta-analysis review of cross-sectional
studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 441-445.
Haynie, D., Nansel, T., Eitel, P., Crump, A., Saylor, K., & Yu, K. (2001). Bullies,
victims and bully/victims: Distinct groups of at-risk youth. Journal of Early Adolescence,
21(1), 29-49.
Himmelweit, H., Biberian, M., & Stockdale, J. (1978). Memory for past vote:
Implications of a study of bias in recall. British Journal of Political Science, 8,
365-375.
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2007). Offline consequences of online victimization:
School violence and delinquency. Journal of School Violence, 6(3), 89-112.
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors
related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 1-29.
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and
responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage (Corwin Press).
Hoffman, J. P., & Miller, A. S. (1998). A latent variable analysis of general strain
theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14(1), 83-110.
Hoffmann, J. P., & Su, S. S. (1997). The conditional effects of stress on delinquency
and drug use: A strain theory assessment of sex differences. Journal of Research
in Crime and Delinquency, 34(1), 46-78.
Horvath, F. (1982, March). Forgotten unemployment: Recall bias in retrospective
data. Monthly Labor Review, 40-43.
Jensen, G. F., & Brownfield, D. (1986). Gender, lifestyles, and victimization: Beyond
routine activity. Violence and Victims, 1, 85-99.
Kaufman, P., Chen, Z., Choy, S. P., Ruddy, S. A., Miller, A. K., Fleury, J. K., et al.
(2000). Indicators of school crime and safety, 2000 (No. NCES 2001-017/NCJ-
184176). Washington, DC: U.S. Departments of Education and Justice.
748 Youth & Society 43(2)
Kobus, K., & Reyes, O. (2000). A descriptive study of urban Mexican American adolescents’
perceived stress and coping. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences,
22, 163-178.
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school
students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S22-S30.
Lagerspetz, K., Bjorkvqvist, K., Bertz, M., & King, E. (1982). Group aggression
among school children in three schools. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23,
45-52.
Lauritsen, J. L., Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (1992). Conventional and delinquent
activities: Implications for the prevention of violent victimization among adolescents.
Violence and Victims, 7, 91-108.
Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School
Psychology International, 27, 157-170.
Li, Q. (2007). New bottle but old wine: A research on cyberbullying in schools. Computers
and Human Behavior, 23, 1777-1791.
Limber, S. P., & Nation, M. N. (1998). Bullying among children and youth. Combating
fear and restoring safety in schools. Retrieved January 20, 2006, from http://
ojjdp.ncjrs.org/jjbulletin/9804/bullying2.html
Loeber, R., & Disheon, T. J. (1984). Early predictors of male delinquency: A review.
Psychological Bulletin, 94, 68-99.
Loeber, R., Kalb, L., & Huizinga, D. (2001). Juvenile delinquency and serious
injury victimization. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice.
Magnusson, D., Statten, H., & Duner, A. (1983). Aggression and criminality in a
longitudinal perspective. In K. T. V. Dusen & S. A. Mednick (Eds.), Prospective
studies of crime and delinquency (pp. 277-301). Amsterdam: Kluwer Nijoff.
Manning, M., Heron, J., & Marshal, T. (1978). Style of hostility and social interactions
at nursery school and at home: An extended study of children. In A. Lionel,
M. B. Hersov, & D. Shaffer (Eds.), Aggression and antisocial behavior in childhood
and adolescence (pp. 29-58). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Matheny, K. B., Aycock, D. W., & McCarthy, C. J. (1993). Stress in school-aged children
and youth. Educational Psychology Review, 5(2), 109-134.
Mazerolle, P., Burton, V., Cullen, F. T., Evans, D., & Payne, G. L. (2000). Strain, anger,
and delinquent adaptations: Specifying general strain theory. Journal of Criminal
Justice, 28, 89-101.
Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Linking exposure to strain with anger: An investigation
of deviant adaptations. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 195-211.
Mazerolle, P., Piquero, A., & Capowich, G. E. (2003). Examining the links between
strain, situational and dispositional anger, and crime. Youth & Society, 35, 131-158.
McCraty, R., Atkinson, M., Tomasino, D., Goelitz, J., & Mayrovitz, H. N. (1999). The
impact of an emotional self-management skills course on psychosocial functioning
Patchin and Hinduja 749
and autonomic recovery to stress in middle school children. Integrative Psychological
and Behavioral Science, 34, 246-268.
Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis (Vol. 106). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review,
3, 672-682.
Miller, D. F., Telljohann, S. K., & Symons, C. W. (1996). Health education in
the elementary and middle-level school (2nd ed.). Madison, WI: Brown &
Benchmark.
Miller, N. E. (1941). The frustration-aggression hypothesis. Psychological Review,
48, 337-342.
Miller, S., & McCormick, J. (1991). Stress: Teaching children to cope. Journal of
Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 62(2), 53-70.
Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1995). Sex differences in distress: Real or artifact?
American Sociological Review, 60, 449-468.
Morgenstern, R., & Barrett, N. (1974). The retrospective bias in unemployment
reporting by sex, race and age. Journal of the American Statistical Association,
69, 355-357.
Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P.
(2001). Bullying behaviors among U.S. youth: Prevalence and association with
psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285,
2094-2100.
Nofzinger, S. (2001). Bullies, fights, and guns: Testing self-control theory with juveniles.
New York: LFB Scholarly.
Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Washington,
DC: Hemisphere Press (Wiley).
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Olweus, D. (1999). Norway. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus,
R. Catalano, & P. Slee (Eds.), Nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective.
London: Routledge.
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary
look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 148-169.
Paternoster, R., & Mazerolle, P. (1994). General strain theory and delinquency—A
replication and extension. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31,
235-263.
Patterson, G. R. (2002). Recent developments in our understanding of parenting:
Bidirectional effects, causal models, and the search for parsimony. In M. H. Bornstein
(Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Vol. 5. Practical issues in parenting (2nd ed.,
pp. 59-88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rigby, K. (2003). Consequences of bullying in schools. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry,
48, 583-590.
750 Youth & Society 43(2)
Rigby, K., & Slee, P. T. (1993). Dimensions of interpersonal relating among Australian
school children and their implications for psychological well-being. Journal of
Social Psychology, 133(1), 33-42.
Rigby, K., & Slee, P. T. (1999). Australia. In P. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas,
D. Olweus, R. Catalano, & P. Slee (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A crossnational
perspective (pp. 324-339). London and New York: Routledge.
Riley, P., & McDaniel, J. (2000). School violence prevention, intervention, and crisis
response. Professional School Counseling, 4, 120-125.
Roland, E. (1980). Terror i skolen. Stavanger, Norway: Rogaland Research Institute.
Roland, E. (2002). Bullying, depressive symptoms and suicidal thoughts. Educational
Research, 44, 55-67.
Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., Kaistaniemi, L., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1999). Selfevaluated
self-esteem, peer-evaluated self-esteem, and defensive egotism as predictors
of adolescents’ participation in bullying situations. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1268-1278.
Sampson, R. J., & Lauritsen, J. L. (1990). Deviant lifestyles, proximity to crime, and
the offender-victim link in personal violence. Journal of Research in Crime and
Delinquency, 27(1), 110-139.
Sampson, R. J., & Lauritsen, J. L. (Eds.). (1993). Violent victimization and offending:
Individual-, situational-, and community-level risk factors (Vol. 3). Washington,
DC: National Research Council.
Schreck, C. J., Mitchel, J. M., & Gibson, C. (2003). Trouble in the school yard: A
study of the risk factors of victimization at school. Crime & Delinquency, 49,
460-484.
Seals, D., & Young, J. (2003). Bullying and victimization: Prevalence and relationship
to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem and depression. Adolescence,
38, 735-747.
Slee, P. T., & Rigby, K. (1993). The relationship of Eysenck’s personality factors and
self esteem to bully/victim behaviour in Australian school boys. Personality and
Individual Differences, 14, 371-373.
Steinberg, L., & Silk, J. S. (2002). Parenting adolescents. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.),
Handbook of parenting: Volume 1. Children and parenting (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Stephenson, P., & Smith, D. (1989). Bullying in junior school. In D. P. T. D. A. Lane
(Ed.), Bullying in schools (pp. 45-58). Stroke-on-Trent, UK: Trentham.
Tattum, D. P. (1989). Violence and aggression in schools. In D. P. Tattum & D. A. Lane
(Eds.), Bullying in schools (pp. 7-19). Stroke-on-Trent, UK: Trentham.
Thaxton, S., & Agnew, R. (2004). The nonlinear effects of parental and teacher
attachment on delinquency: Disentangling strain from social control explanations.
Justice Quarterly, 21, 763-792.
Patchin and Hinduja 751
Tittle, C. R., Broidy, L. M., & Gertz, M. G. (2008). Strain, crime, and contingencies.
Justice Quarterly, 25, 283-312.
Wallace, L. H., Patchin, J. W., & May, J. D. (2005). Reactions of victimized youth:
Strain as an explanation of school delinquency. Western Criminology Review, 6(1),
104-116.
Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in
junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 31(1), 3-25.
Ybarra, M. L., Espelage, D. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2007). The co-occurrence of Internet
harassment and unwanted sexual solicitation victimization and perpetration: Associations
with psychosocial indicators. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S31-S41.
Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, J. K. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors and targets:
A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology
and Psychiatry, 45, 1308-1316.
Bios
Justin W. Patchin, PhD, is an associate professor of criminal justice in the Department
of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire. For the past
several years, he has been studying adolescent Internet use and misuse, including
social networking and cyberbullying. He is coauthor of Bullying Beyond the Schoolyard:
Preventing and Responding to Cyberbullying (2009, Sage) and codirector of the
Cyberbullying Research Center (www.cyberbullying.us), both with Sameer Hinduja.
Sameer Hinduja, PhD, is an associate professor in the School of Criminology and
Criminal Justice at Florida Atlantic University. He studies various forms of computerrelated
wrongdoing from both social and technological perspectives, and works
nationally and internationally with school districts, law enforcement, and the private
sector toward its understanding and response



ليست هناك تعليقات:

إرسال تعليق